Services

Six service categories. One controlled loop underneath.

Whatever the engagement, the method is the same — every technology assessed against the same seven regulatory perimeters, with the reasoning recorded rather than asserted.

7
regulatory perimeters — assessed in every engagement, whichever service line
6
service categories — entered at different points of the study
5
steps in the loop: inventory, assess, register, monitor, re-assess
2–3 weeks
to a Snapshot Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) — the usual way in
Quality & Regulatory AssuranceRegulated Software & Data SystemsPatient EngagementEU Authorised RepresentativeDigital TransformationDHT in Trialsone controlled loop
Six ways in. One method underneath — the same loop, the same seven perimeters, whichever line you engage.

Six service lines, one method underneath

Every engagement runs the same controlled loop — Inventory, Assess, Register, Monitor, Re-assess — across the same seven regulatory perimeters. What changes between categories is where in the lifecycle you are and which obligations dominate, not how the decision gets made.

That matters commercially: you can start with one device on one protocol and expand into full portfolio governance without ever re-doing the groundwork, because the register you build in week one is the register you keep.

DESIGNSTART-UPCONDUCTCLOSE-OUTPOST-STUDYDHT in TrialsRegulated Software & DataPatient EngagementQuality & Regulatory AssuranceEU Authorised RepresentativeDigital Transformationwhere each service line acts on a study — the same loop, entered at a different point
Buyers think in study phases. This is where each line enters and how far it runs — DHT in Trials in teal, because it is the one that spans the study and the one most engagements start with.

How to choose the right supporting capability

The practice is DHT governance — governing the digital health technologies a clinical trial relies on. The five supporting capabilities below are where the loop finds work that has to be closed: quality systems that cannot evidence the decision, software that was never validated, an economic-operator role nobody accepted, participant-facing technology that changes what the data means, or a transformation programme that introduced regulated systems without a register.

Most engagements start with DHT governance in trials because that is where the device inventory and the Snapshot assessment live. The other capabilities are engaged when the assessment names a gap — not because a checklist says you should buy five things at once.

What we do

Digital Health Technologies in Trials

End-to-end DHT governance: compliance assessment, regulatory classification, fit-for-purpose validation, logistics and lifecycle, data interoperability, training and inspection readiness. The core service, and where most engagements start.

Explore →

Quality & Regulatory Assurance

QMS implementation under ISO 13485:2016 and the FDA QMSR (21 CFR Part 820, in force since 2 February 2026), pre-market submissions, risk management to ISO 14971, gap analysis and CAPA, supplier engineering, post-market surveillance, audits, mock inspections and PRRC services.

Explore →

Regulated Software & Data Systems

Medical device software under IEC 62304, computer system validation under GAMP 5, 21 CFR Part 11 and EU GMP Annex 11 compliance, ALCOA+ data integrity programmes, and the move from document-heavy CSV to risk-based CSA.

Explore →

Patient Engagement

Education, remote monitoring, support programmes and patient-reported outcomes — designed around human factors and use safety, so participants stay in the study and the data keeps arriving.

Explore →

EU Authorised Representative

Full-scope EU AR services for non-EU manufacturers under EU MDR 2017/745 and IVDR 2017/746 — EUDAMED registration, technical documentation review, vigilance and the accountable economic-operator role.

Explore →

Digital Transformation of Clinical Operations

Moving sponsors and CROs from fragmented, paper-heavy or partially validated environments to a single controlled loop covering every DHT, eClinical system and data flow. Five gated, fixed-fee phases, with regulatory and quality running as a workstream rather than a review at the end.

Explore →
PROCUREMENTYour vendor has quietlymade you the manufacturer→ QARAPROTOCOLA consumer device isgenerating an endpoint→ DHT in TrialsMID-STUDYA firmware or appupdate lands→ DHT in TrialsCONDUCTThe data lands in thevendor’s cloud,not in your trial→ Regulated SoftwareBEFORE INSPECTIONAn inspection is scheduledand the evidenceis scattered→ QARACLOSE-OUTThe study ends and thedevices come homewith data on them→ DHT in Trials
Each has a moment. Three of the six route to DHT governance — which is why most engagements start there. The register is what lets you see one coming rather than read about it in a finding.

Where a device usually goes wrong

Six situations that bring sponsors to us. If one of them is familiar, you already know which service line you need.

A firmware or app update lands mid-study

Someone has to decide that week whether it needs documentation only, bridging evidence or full revalidation — and defend that call later.

How we classify it →

Your vendor has quietly made you the manufacturer

Relabelling, kit assembly or configuration can move the economic-operator role onto the sponsor without anyone signing anything.

How we test for it →

A consumer device is generating an endpoint

Fit-for-purpose is a question about the protocol, not the product page. It needs an evidence package, not an assurance from the vendor.

How we validate it →

An inspection is scheduled and the evidence is scattered

The register, the classification rationale, the training records and the change history should already be one bundle. Usually they are not.

How we assemble it →

The data lands in the vendor’s cloud, not in your trial

Raw readings sit under the vendor’s retention rules while the eClinical backbone waits. Data integrity expects you to control provenance from sensor to submission — not to inherit it.

How we connect it →

The study ends and the devices come home — with data on them

Return, wiping and disposition are part of the device lifecycle. A handset with subject data in a courier bag is a privacy finding waiting to be written.

How we close it out →

What every engagement leaves behind

Capabilities differ; artefacts do not. Every run of the loop produces the same controlled documents — versioned, attributable, and indexed so an inspector, a notified body or your own quality team can find the reasoning without asking us for it:

That is what makes a supporting capability expandable: the register you build for one device in week one is the register you keep when the portfolio grows.

Two papers behind the practice

A free account opens both — no approval step, no sales call attached.

qointa service overview qointa Services brochuresFree

qointa service overview

qointa's full service portfolio across quality management, regulatory compliance, software development, contract research, patient engagement and digital transformation.

Download PDF →
The Sponsor’s Accountability Map Position papersFree

The Sponsor’s Accountability Map

A companion reading from the sponsor’s seat — what you can delegate the work of, and what you answer for regardless

Read the summary →
QMS Integration: Embedding DHT Controls across Sponsor and Vendor Quality Systems Position papers

QMS Integration: Embedding DHT Controls across Sponsor and Vendor Quality Systems

Why the seam between GCP, ISO 13485 and software-lifecycle quality systems is where DHT control is won or lost.

Read the summary →

All papers in the library →

Start with one device and one protocol

Fifteen minutes. You will leave knowing which perimeters it opens and which service category closes them.

Book a 15-minute call